The W-defense

Philosophical Studies 150 (1):61-77 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There has been a great deal of critical discussion of Harry Frankfurt’s argument against the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP), almost all of which has focused on whether the Frankfurt-style examples, which are designed to be counterexamples to PAP, can be given a coherent formulation. Recently, however, David Widerker has argued that even if Frankfurt-style examples can be given a coherent formulation, there is reason to believe that an agent in those examples could never be morally blameworthy for what she has done. Therefore, such examples do not undermine a version of PAP restricted to blameworthiness. Widerker refers to his argument for this claim as the W-defense. I examine the W-defense in some detail, along with three recent replies to it by defenders of Frankfurt’s argument. I contend that each of these replies is problematic and, indeed, that two of them play directly into the hands of those seeking to defend PAP. I then develop my own reply to the W-defense by calling into question an assumption which is at the heart of that argument regarding the nature of moral blame.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Capes on the W-Defense.David Palmer - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (2):555-566.
Flickering the W‐Defense.Michael Robinson - 2023 - Philosophical Issues 33 (1):198-210.
The W-Defense Defended.Justin A. Capes - 2024 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11.
Frankfurt-Counterexamples and the “W-Defense”.G. Carlos Patarroyo - 2013 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 19:56-80.
Frankfurt-Counterexamples and the “W-Defense”[Spanish].G. Patarroyo & G. Carlos - 2013 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 19:56-80.
Stumping For Widerker.Stewart Goetz - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):83-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-30

Downloads
201 (#127,558)

6 months
11 (#246,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin A. Capes
Flagler College

Citations of this work

The W-Defense Defended.Justin A. Capes - 2024 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 11.
Capes on the W-Defense.David Palmer - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (2):555-566.
Blame and the Humean Theory of Motivation.Adam R. Thompson - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (3):1345-1364.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations