DID I DO IT? -YEAH, YOU DID!

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences:34- 37 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we analyze Libet’s conclusions on «free will» (FW), rejecting his view of the concept and defending a partially aligned view with Wittgenstein’s early remarks on FW. First, the concept of Readiness Potential (RP) and Libet’s view are presented. Second, we offer an account of Wittgenstein´s point of view. Third, a dual-domain analysis is proposed; finally, we offer our conclusions. This article´s conclusion is part of an ongoing research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The limits of the neuroscience of moral responsibility.Daniel de Vasconcelos Costa - 2021 - Ethic@: An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 20 (1).
What should we retain from a plain person's concept of free will?Gilberto Gomes - 2005 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (1):40-43.
Volition and the readiness potential.Gilberto Gomes - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (8-9):59-76.
Free will and the readiness potential.G. Gomes - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):S35 - S35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-27

Downloads
672 (#38,290)

6 months
67 (#88,678)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Carlos Muñoz-Suárez
Universitat de Barcelona
Rene J. Campis C.
Universidad del Valle

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references