David Kaplan and Richard Montague. A paradox regained. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 1 , pp. 79–90. - Martin Gardner. A new prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 13 , p. 51. - K. R. Popper. A comment on the new prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 13 , p. 51 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):102-103 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2270600

Other Versions

edition Cargile, James (1965) "Review: David Kaplan, Richard Montague, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic: A Paradox Regained; Martin Gardner, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science: A New Prediction Paradox; K. R. Popper, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science:A Comment on the New Prediction Paradox". Journal of Symbolic Logic 30(1):102-103

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Karl R. Popper. Two autonomous axiom systems for the calculus of probabilities. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , pp. 51–57. - K. R. Popper. Errata. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 176. - K. R. Popper. Corrigendum. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 6 , p. 351. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1958 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 23 (3):349-349.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
B. Meltzer. The third possibility. Mind, n.s. vol. 73 , pp. 430–433. - B. Meltzer and I. J. Good. Two forms of the prediction paradox. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 16 no. 61 , pp. 50–51. - William H. Halberstadt. In defence of Euclid: A reply to B. Meltzer. Mind, n.s. vol. 76 , p. 282. [REVIEW]Alan Ross Anderson - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):458-459.
Popper Karl R.. Degree of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , pp. 143–149.Popper K. R.. Errata and corrigenda. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , p. 359. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):304-305.
Shaw R.. The paradox of the unexpected examination. Mind, n.s. vol. 67 , pp. 382–384.Lyon Ardon. The prediction paradox. Mind, n.s. vol. 68 , pp. 510–517.Nerlich G. C.. Unexpected examinations and unprovable statements. Mind, n.s. vol. 70 , pp. 503–513.Medlin Brian. The unexpected examination. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , pp. 66–72. See Corrigenda, Brian Medlin. The unexpected examination. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , p. 333.)Fitch Frederic B.. A Goedelized formulation of the prediction paradox. American philosophical quarterly , vol. 1 no. 1 , pp. 161–164. [REVIEW]Jonathan Bennett - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1):101-102.
Thomas Ivo. Independence of Faris-rejection-axioms. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 1 , pp. 48–51.Hugues Leblanc - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (1):113-113.
Robert L. Martin. Toward a solution to the liar paradox. The philosophical review, vol. 76, pp. 279–311. - Robert L. Martin. On Grelling's paradox. The philosophical review, vol. 77 , pp. 321–331. - Bas C. van Fraassen. Presupposition, implication, and self-reference. The journal of philosophy, vol. 65 , pp. 136–152. - Brian Skyrms. Return of the liar: three-valued logic and the concept of truth. American philosophical quarterly, vol. 7 , pp. 153–161. - Robert L. Martin. Preface. The paradox of the liar, edited by Robert L. Martin, Yale University Press, New Haven and London 1970, p. vii. [REVIEW]James Cargile - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (4):584-587.
Hugues Leblanc. On so-called degrees of confirmation. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 pp. 312–315. - K. R. Popper. Probabilistic independence and corroboration by empirical tests. The British Journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 pp. 315–318. [REVIEW]Harry V. Stopes-Roe - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
35 (#645,327)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Cargile
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references