Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics

In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. pp. 261 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Implicature and Explicature.Robyn Carston & Alison Hall - 2012 - In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 47-84.
Word Meaning, What is Said, and Explicature.Robyn Carston - 2013 - In Carlo Penco & Filippo Domaneschi (eds.), What Is Said and What Is Not: The Semantics/pragmatics Interface. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy.Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.) - 2013 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
Focus: A case study on the semantics–pragmatics boundary.Michael Glanzberg - 2004 - In Zoltan Gendler Szabo (ed.), Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 72--110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
171 (#136,526)

6 months
10 (#367,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robyn Anne Carston
University College London

Citations of this work

Conversational Impliciture.Kent Bach - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (2):124-162.
Context and logical form.Jason Stanley - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (4):391--434.
The Pragmatics of What is Said.François Recanati - 1989 - Mind and Language 4 (4):295-329.
Relevance theory.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2002 - In Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber (eds.), Relevance theory. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 607-632.

View all 83 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references