Mirroring cannot account for understanding action

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):23-24 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Susan Hurley's shared circuits model (SCM) rightly begins in action and progresses through a series of layers; but it fails to reach action understanding because it relies on mirroring as a driving force, draws on heavily criticized theories, and neglects the need for shared experience in our grasp of social understanding

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Shared circuits, shared time, and interpersonal synchrony.Michael J. Hove - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):29-30.
Does one size fit all? Hurley on shared circuits.Alvin I. Goldman - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):27-28.
Bootstrapping the mind.Julian Kiverstein & Andy Clark - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):41-58.
Mesial frontal cortex and super mirror neurons.Marco Iacoboni - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):30-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
89 (#235,263)

6 months
13 (#253,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Enactive processing of the syntax of sign language.Christopher Mole & Graham H. Turner - 2019 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18 (2):317-332.
Names, Descriptions, and Assertion.Ray Buchanan - 2014 - In Zsu-Wei Hung (ed.), Communicative Action. Springer. pp. 03-15.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2004 - MIT Press.
The Emotions.Nico Frijda - 1986 - Cambridge University Press.
How the Body Shapes the Mind.Shaun Gallagher - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 93 references / Add more references