Supposing for the Sake of Argument

Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 15 (1):76-79 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For Goodness Sake. [REVIEW]Graham McDonough - 2010 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 25 (1):47-52.
The Delimitation of ‘Argument’.Michael Gilbert - 1995 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 15 (1):63-75.
Argument Management, Informal Logic and Critical Thinking.J. Anthony Blair - 1996 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 15 (4):80-93.
From Critical Thinking to Non-conclusive Argument and Back Again. [REVIEW]Paul A. Wagner - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):34-38.
From Critical Thinking to Non-conclusive Argument and Back Again. [REVIEW]Paul A. Wagner - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):34-38.
Argument Construction: A Neglected Area?Clive Lindop - 1988 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 2 (4):2-2.
Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines.Matthew Lipman - 1988 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 1 (1):3-4.
Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines.Mark Weinstein - 1988 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 2 (3):2-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
65 (#327,684)

6 months
10 (#422,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Cargile
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

V. Action and reaction.Donald Davidson - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):140-148.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references