The Cultural Evolution of Structured Languages in an Open‐Ended, Continuous World

Cognitive Science 41 (4):892-923 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Language maps signals onto meanings through the use of two distinct types of structure. First, the space of meanings is discretized into categories that are shared by all users of the language. Second, the signals employed by the language are compositional: The meaning of the whole is a function of its parts and the way in which those parts are combined. In three iterated learning experiments using a vast, continuous, open-ended meaning space, we explore the conditions under which both structured categories and structured signals emerge ex nihilo. While previous experiments have been limited to either categorical structure in meanings or compositional structure in signals, these experiments demonstrate that when the meaning space lacks clear preexisting boundaries, more subtle morphological structure that lacks straightforward compositionality—as found in natural languages—may evolve as a solution to joint pressures from learning and communication.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meaning and Compositional Structure.Gary Martin Ebbs - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Compositionality and Linguistic Evolution.Simon Kirby & Kenny Smith - 2012 - In Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford University Press.
The Evolution of Compositionality in Signaling Games.Michael Franke - 2016 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 25 (3-4):355-377.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-07

Downloads
68 (#301,765)

6 months
15 (#190,835)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile