True, false, paranormal and 'designated'?: A reply to Jenkins

&
Analysis 68 (3):238–244 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jenkins (2007) charges that the language advanced in Beall (2007) is either expressively impoverished, or inconsistent. We argue that Jenkins’ objections are based on unreasonably strong constraints on formal theories of truth. Our primary concern is not to defend the ‘paranormal’ framework advanced in Beall, but to respond to a common – and implausible – ‘revenge’-style charge directed at a certain class of formal theories of truth and paradox.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.1093/analys/68.3.238

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

True, False, Paranormal and Designated: A Reply to Beall.C. S. Jenkins - 2007 - Analysis 67 (1):80 - 83.
True, false, paranormal and designated: a reply to Beall.C. S. Jenkins - 2007 - Analysis 67 (1):80-83.
Against God of the Truth-Value Gaps.T. Parent - 2024 - Analysis 84 (3):516-522.
The Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox.J. C. Beall (ed.) - 2007 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
Truth, Revenge, and Internalizability.Kevin Scharp - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (3):597-645.
A Note on the Unprovability of Consistency in Formal Theories of Truth.Kevin Davey - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (6):1313-1340.
Gappying Curry Redux.Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - 2024 - Sophia 63 (1):5-11.
Currying Omnipotence: A Reply to Beall and Cotnoir.Andrew Tedder & Guillermo Badia - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):119-121.
Paradox, Repetition, Revenge.Keith Simmons - 2015 - Topoi 34 (1):121-131.
Naïve validity.Julien Murzi & Lorenzo Rossi - 2017 - Synthese 199 (Suppl 3):819-841.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
158 (#153,619)

6 months
28 (#125,754)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Colin R. Caret
Utrecht University
A. J. Cotnoir
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Validity for Strong Pluralists.Aaron J. Cotnoir - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3):563-579.
Pluralism and Paradox.Aaron J. Cotnoir - 2012 - In Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Cory Wright, Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 339.
Expressibility and the Liar's Revenge.Lionel Shapiro - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):297-314.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The normativity of content.Paul A. Boghossian - 2003 - Philosophical Issues 13 (1):31-45.
Does thought imply ought?Krister Bykvist & Anandi Hattiangadi - 2007 - Analysis 67 (4):277–285.
The Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox.J. C. Beall (ed.) - 2007 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
Solving the paradoxes, escaping revenge.Hartry Field - 2007 - In J. C. Beall, The Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 8 references / Add more references