- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The mind is a system of modules shaped by natural selection
In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 293--311 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The mind is not (just) a system of modules shaped (just) by natural selection.James F. Woodward & Fiona Cowie - 2004 - In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 312-34.
Is the mind a system of modules shaped by natural selection?Peter Carruthers - 2003 - In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Review of The Nature of the Mind: An Introduction, by Peter Carruthers. [REVIEW]Hugh Marlowe - 2005 - Essays in Philosophy 6 (1):286-289.
Review of Peter Carruthers and Andrew Chamberlain: Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition. [REVIEW]Peter Carruthers, Andrew Chamberlin & Jerry Fodor - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):623-628.
Peter Carruthers, the architecture of the mind.Pritha Chandra - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (1):133-139.
Evolution and the human mind: Modularity, language and meta-cognition Peter Carruthers and Andrew Chamberlin.Jerry Fodor - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):623-628.
Peter Carruthers and Peter K. Smith, eds., Theories of Theories of Mind. [REVIEW]Brian Garrett - 1996 - Philosophy in Review 16:319-322.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-26
Downloads
38 (#594,244)
6 months
38 (#110,227)
2014-01-26
Downloads
38 (#594,244)
6 months
38 (#110,227)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Visually Perceiving the Intentions of Others.Grace Helton - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (271):243-264.
Evolutionary psychology versus Fodor: Arguments for and against the massive modularity hypothesis.Willem E. Frankenhuis & Annemie Ploeger - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):687 – 710.
Quick and Smart? Modularity and the Pro-Emotion Consensus.Karen Jones - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (sup1):2-27.
The mind's Bermuda Triangle: philosophy of emotions and empirical science.Ronald de Sousa - 2009 - In Peter Goldie (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2