El problema interpretativo de la mecánica cuántica. Interpretación minimal e interpretaciones totales

Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 8:9-42 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I contend that standard quantum theory has a minimal interpretation, on which all physicists agree. That interpretation is sufficient for every application of quantum theory and it has been confirmed by a countless number of experiments. However, it provides neither an overall picture of the quantum world nor an intended ontology for quantum theory. For those reasons, several full interpretations have been proposed in order to complete the minimal interpretation. I then argue that those interpretations –which are empirically equivalent, but mutually incompatible- are metaphysical ventures that cannot be confirmed by any conceivable experience. Moreover, I claim that the program of finding the ontology for quantum theory rests on the false assumption that there is a unique ontology compatible with each physical theory. I conclude that there is no direct path either from the formalism of quantum theory to its intended ontology, or from determinate metaphysical assumptions to the quantum formalism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-16

Downloads
28 (#796,220)

6 months
4 (#1,246,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Ontological relativity.W. V. O. Quine - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (7):185-212.
The principles of quantum mechanics.Paul Dirac - 1930 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
Pursuit of truth.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1992 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Interpreting Quantum Theories: The Art of the Possible.Laura Ruetsche - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 34 references / Add more references