Neurobiology supports virtue theory on the role of heuristics in moral cognition

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):547-548 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sunstein is right that poorly informed heuristics can influence moral judgment. His case could be strengthened by tightening neurobiologically plausible working definitions regarding what a heuristic is, considering a background moral theory that has more strength in wide reflective equilibrium than “weak consequentialism,” and systematically examining what naturalized virtue theory has to say about the role of heuristics in moral reasoning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognitivism, controversy, and moral heuristics.Matthew D. Adler - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):542-543.
Intuitions, heuristics, and utilitarianism.Peter Singer - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):560-561.
A selectionist approach integrates moral heuristics.Robert A. Hinde - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):555-556.
Regulation of risks.Paul Weirich - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):564-565.
Gauging the heuristic value of heuristics.Philip E. Tetlock - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):562-563.
Moral heuristics or moral competence? Reflections on Sunstein.John Mikhail - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):557-558.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#150,590)

6 months
9 (#492,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Moral Landscape. [REVIEW]Bill Shaw - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):411-415.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references