Pollock and Sturgeon on defeaters

Synthese 195 (7):2897-2906 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scott Sturgeon has recently challenged Pollock’s account of undercutting defeaters. The challenge involves three primary contentions: the account is both too strong and too weak, undercutting defeaters exercise their power to defeat only in conjunction with higher-order beliefs about the basis of the lower-order beliefs whose justification they target, and since rebutting defeaters exercise their power to defeat in isolation, rebutting and undercutting defeaters work in fundamentally different ways. My goal is to reject each of these contentions. I maintain that Sturgeon fails to show that Pollock’s account of undercutting defeaters is either too strong or too weak, his own account of how undercutting defeaters exercise their power to defeat is both too strong and too weak, and his claim that rebutting and undercutting defeaters work in fundamentally different ways is mistaken.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Undercutting Defeat: When it Happens and Some Implications for Epistemology.Matthew McGrath - 2021 - In Jessica Brown & Mona Simion, Reasons, Justification, and Defeat. Oxford Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 201-222.
Dualism about undercutting defeat.Marco Tiozzo - 2024 - Ratio 37 (2-3):145-155.
Undefeated dualism.Tomas Bogardus - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):445-466.
Skeptical Theism and Undercutting Defeaters.Mike Almeida - 2014 - In Trent Dougherty & Justin P. McBrayer, Skeptical Theism: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-31

Downloads
160 (#152,261)

6 months
9 (#445,453)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Albert Casullo
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

References found in this work

Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
Pollock on defeasible reasons.Scott Sturgeon - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (1):105-118.
Pollock on defeasible reasons.Scott Sturgeon - 2012 - Philosophical Studies (1):1-14.

View all 6 references / Add more references