Scientific Methodology: A View from Early String Theory

Abstract

This paper addresses the question as to whether the methodology followed in building/assessing string theory can be considered scientific in the same sense, say, that the methodology followed in building/assessing the Standard Model of particle physics is scientific, by focussing on the "founding" period of the theory. More precisely, its aim is to argue for a positive answer to the above question – there is no real change of scientific status in the way of proceeding and reasoning in fundamental physical research – in the light of a historical analysis of the early developments of the string theoretical framework.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

String theory and general methodology: A mutual evaluation.Lars-Göran Johansson & Keizo Matsubara - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (3):199-210.
String Theory and the Scientific Method.Richard Dawid - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
String Theory and Scientific Realism.Richard Dawid - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 60:9-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
53 (#407,997)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elena Castellani
Università degli Studi di Firenze

Citations of this work

Non-empirical robustness arguments in quantum gravity.Niels S. Linnemann - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72:70-86.
Convergence strategies for theory assessment.Elena Castellani - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 104 (C):78-87.

Add more citations