The Cartesian Semantics of the Port Royal Logic [Book Review]

History and Philosophy of Logic 43 (4):394-396 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The long-lasting and debatable claim that in the seventeenth century, logic did not attract the attention of the best minds, with the exception of Leibniz, is reassessed in current research in the...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Cartesian Semantics of the Port Royal Logic, written by John N. Martin.Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson - 2020 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 14 (2):216-217.
Logic in Early Modern Thought.Katarina Peixoto & Edgar da Rocha Marques - 2020 - Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences,.
The Modal Equivalence Rules of the Port-Royal Logic.John Grey - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (3):210-221.
The Port-Royal Logic in the Twentieth Century.Richard A. Watson - 1967 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 5 (1):55-60.
Port Royal Logic.John N. Martin - 2017 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Note on ‘Distributive Terms, Truth, and The Port Royal Logic’.John Neil Martin - 2016 - History and Philosophy of Logic 37 (4):391-392.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-14

Downloads
35 (#652,794)

6 months
10 (#427,773)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Nature of Cartesian Logic.Roger Ariew - 2021 - Perspectives on Science 29 (3):275-291.
La sémiologie de Port-Royal.Joël Biard - 2015 - Archives de Philosophie 78 (1):9-28.

Add more references