Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):21-22 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The claims about (1) the lack of empirical support for a model of strong reciprocation and (2) the irrelevant empirical role of costly punishment to support cooperation in the field need qualifications. The interpretation of field evidence is not straightforward, and other-regarding preferences are also likely to play a role in the field

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In the lab and the field: Punishment is rare in equilibrium.Simon Gächter - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):26 - 28.
The social structure of cooperation and punishment.Herbert Gintis & Ernst Fehr - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):28-29.
Reciprocity and uncertainty.Yoella Bereby-Meyer - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):18-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
33 (#675,756)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references