- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Space of Seeing-In
British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):271-278 (2011)
Abstract
Recent work on seeing-in has taken a pluralist turn. There is variety among pictures, so we should expect variety among seeing-in. Dominic Lopes’s taxonomy of seeing-in is arguably the most thorough that is currently available. Lopes identifies five varieties of seeing-in. In this paper I identify a sixth: pseudo-actualism. This paper improves our current best taxonomy of seeing-inAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- bbk.academia.edu
(no proxy) - bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org (no proxy)
- bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org [2] (no proxy)
- bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org [3] (no proxy)
- bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org [4] (no proxy)
- bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org [5] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is Seeing-In a Transparency Effect?Michael Newall - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (2):131-156.
Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance.Robert Hopkins - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 151.
Seeing depicted space (or not).Mikael Pettersson - 2018 - In Anna Bergqvist & Robert Cowan (eds.), Evaluative Perception. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
More Seeing-in: Surface Seeing, Design Seeing, and Meaning Seeing in Pictures.Peer Bundgaard - 2015 - In Peer F. Bundgaard & Frederik Stjernfelt (eds.), Investigations Into the Phenomenology and the Ontology of the Work of Art: What are Artworks and How Do We Experience Them? Cham: Springer Verlag.
The puzzle of mimesis.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2005 - In Dominic Lopes (ed.), Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Seeing What Is Not There: Pictorial Experience, Imagination, and Non-localization.Mikael Pettersson - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):279–294.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-05-15
Downloads
135 (#163,692)
6 months
18 (#160,076)
2011-05-15
Downloads
135 (#163,692)
6 months
18 (#160,076)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Are Pictures Peculiar Objects of Perception?Gabriele Ferretti - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (3):372-393.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2