Abstract

Lord Simey’s work appears to be a sincere effort to counteract the prevailing trend in modern sociology, namely, the so-called empiricistic, ‘objective’ or, as it usually boils down to, the statistical approach to social research. As he sees the central issue: ‘On the one hand we have the proponents of “social science” as a quasi-natural science, with the accent on the need for objectivity and freedom from personal ties; on the other there is the comprehending of the subject as a means of studying the more intimate realities of social life, in the sense of a concern with the aspirations of man, his ideals and motivating ideas, his achievements, satisfactions, frustrations and denials. These latter it is held by the second school of thought, are of paramount importance to social scientists, and it is in more intangible ideas rather than “objective” facts that they find qualities of compelling reality’. Being a member of the second school of thought, the author’s purpose is to undermine his overly empiricistically minded opponents. ‘Here lies the underlying theme of the present book, which attempts to discover how far and in what sense the clarification and the formulation of values is a truly scientific activity, and whether this requires the widening of the concept of social science to incorporate some of the attributes of philosophical criticism’. ‘It is the purpose of this book to endeavour to demonstrate that the concept of “science”, if it is to be applied to social as well as physical phenomena, must be very substantially adapted and developed for the purpose’.