- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Information gain and decision-theoretic approaches to data selection: Response to Klauer (1999)
Psychological Review 106 (1):223-227 (1999)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
On the analysis of irrational data selection: A critique of Oaksford and Chater (1994).Donald Laming - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (2):364-373.
Nick Chater and Mike Oaksford, eds. The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science Reviewed by.Anton Petrenko - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (1):16-19.
Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction.Jonathan St B. T. Evans & David E. Over - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (2):356-363.
Beyond response output: More logical than we think.Wim De Neys - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):87-88.
Theories of reasoning and the representational level: A reply to Oaksford.Carlos Santamar - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (2):209 – 213.
Reaching a decision: A reply to Oaksford.David W. Green & David E. Over - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (2):187-192.
Bayesian rationality for the Wason selection task? A test of optimal data selection theory.Klaus Oberauer, Oliver Wilhelm & Ricardo Rosas Diaz - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (2):115 – 144.
On the normative justification for information gain in Wason's selection task.Karl Christoph Klauer - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (1):215-222.
Theoretical developments in decision field theory: Comment on Tsetsos, Usher, and Chater (2010).Jared M. Hotaling, Jerome R. Busemeyer & Jiyun Li - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (4):1294-1298.
Cognitive ability and variation in selection task performance.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (3):193-230.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
18 (#1,115,326)
6 months
5 (#1,047,105)
2016-06-30
Downloads
18 (#1,115,326)
6 months
5 (#1,047,105)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Finding Useful Questions: On Bayesian Diagnosticity, Probability, Impact, and Information Gain.Jonathan D. Nelson - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (4):979-999.
Probabilistic effects in data selection.Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater & Becki Grainger - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (3):193 – 243.
The rational analysis of mind and behavior.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 2000 - Synthese 122 (1-2):93-131.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2