Mou Zongsan and Tang Junyi on Zhang Zai’s and Wang Fuzhi’s Philosophies of Qi: A Critical Reflection

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):85-98 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fuzhi’s philosophies of qi. In this essay, both the strength and weakness of their interpretations will be critically examined. As a contrast, an alternative interpretation of the School of qi in Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism will be outlined. This new interpretation will uncover that, like Leibniz, Zhang Zai and Wang Fuzhi introduced a non-substantivalist approach in natural philosophy in terms of an innovative concept of force. This interpretation not only helps to show the limitations of Mou Zongsan’s and Tang Junyi’s understandings of Zhang Zai’s and Wang Fuzhi’s doctrines of qi, but also indicates a way to bridge the traditional Chinese philosophy of nature and modern physics. More generally, our critical discussions will bring to light a new angle with which to re-appreciate Mou Zongsan’s and Tang Junyi’s contributions to the development of Confucianism

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Zhang zai's philosophy of qi.Jung-Yeup Kim - 2018 - In Suk Gabriel Choi & Jung-Yeup Kim (eds.), The Idea of Qi/Gi: East Asian and Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-23

Downloads
117 (#183,513)

6 months
4 (#1,244,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.
Selections.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - 1951 - New York,: Scribner. Edited by Philip P. Wiener.

Add more references