- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Overview: AAAS Project on Secrecy and Openness in Science and Technology
Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):28-34 (1985)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Secrecy and Openness in Science: Ethical Considerations.Sissela Bok - 1982 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 7 (1):32-41.
Openness and Secrecy in Science: Their Origins and Limitations.David Hull - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):4-12.
Openness and Secrecy in Science: Some Notes on Early History.Ernan McMullin - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):14-22.
Commentary: Better Data for the Debate on Openness and Secrecy in Science.Ellis Rubinstein - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):105-109.
Case Study: Openness and Secrecy in Computer Research.John C. Cherniavsky - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):99-103.
AAAS: The Mass Media Science Fellows.Gail Breslow - 1981 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 6 (3):41-44.
Commentary: Science, Secrecy, and Democracy.Sal Restivo - 1986 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 11 (1):79-84.
Science and Technology Museums as Policy Tools—An Overview of the Issues.John Zilber, Lisa M. Buchholz & Marcel C. La Follette - 1983 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 8 (3):41-46.
Secrecy in University-Based Research: Who Controls? Who Tells?Marcel C. La Follette - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (2):3-3.
Book Reviews : Element of Risk: The Politics of Radon, by Leonard A. Cole. Washington, DC: AAAS Press, 1993, 246+ ix pp. $29.95 (cloth. [REVIEW]Simon Bennett - 1995 - Science, Technology and Human Values 20 (1):112-115.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-26
Downloads
7 (#1,639,166)
6 months
2 (#1,687,048)
2020-11-26
Downloads
7 (#1,639,166)
6 months
2 (#1,687,048)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Toward More Secrecy in Science? Comments on Some Structural Changes in Science—and on Their Implications for an Ethics of Science.Matthias Kaiser - 1996 - Perspectives on Science 4 (2):207-230.
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.Kathryn Maxson Jones, Rachel A. Ankeny & Robert Cook-Deegan - 2018 - Journal of the History of Biology 51 (4):693-805.
Communication, Competition, and Secrecy: The Production and Dissemination of Research-Related Information in Genetics.Katherine W. McCain - 1991 - Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (4):491-516.
The Unbearable Lightness of Representing ‘Reality’ in Science Education: A response to Schulz.Michalinos Zembylas - 2008 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (4):494-514.
Commentary: Science, Secrecy, and Democracy.Sal Restivo - 1986 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 11 (1):79-84.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2