- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Some Ontological Arguments
Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32 (1993)
Abstract
This was an attempt to show what is wrong with Anselm’s ‘Ontological Argument’ for the existence of God. My present view is that Peter Millican has given us a similar, but much better line of attack in his “The One Fatal Flaw….” Paper.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Saint Anselm and Gaunilo on the Existence of God.P. Alpár Gergely - forthcoming - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia:75-84.
Faith and Conscience—The Surest of Arguments for the Existence of God.Tadeusz Grzesik - 2012 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 17 (2):245-268.
Burhan-e Siddigin in Mulla Sadra's Philosophy in Comparison with Ontological Argument of Anselm and Descartes.Reza Akbarian & Ali Mokhberr Dezfuli - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 1 (202):17-58.
Does Anselm beg the question?Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):5-18.
The Ontological Argument.Sara L. Uckelman - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 25–27.
A simplified ontological argument and fictional entities.Gianluca Di Muzio - 2015 - Think 14 (40):101-107.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-07-09
Downloads
233 (#115,324)
6 months
15 (#168,777)
2009-07-09
Downloads
233 (#115,324)
6 months
15 (#168,777)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Divine Fractal: 1st Order Extensional Theology.Paul Studtmann - 2021 - Philosophia 50 (1):285-305.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-f747c dc2