- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Bisimulation between base argumentation and premise-conclusion argumentation
Artificial Intelligence 336 (C):104203 (2024)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
David Makinson and Leendert Van der Torre.Brian Edison Mcdonald & On Meaningfulness - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29:635-636.
Guido Boella Dov M. Gabbay Leendert van der Torre Serena Villata.Dov M. Gabbay - 2006 - Studia Logica 82:1-59.
The Impact of Argumentation on Artificial Intelligence.David Godden - 2006 - In F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Haft-van Rees & A. M., Considering pragma-dialectics: a festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 287-299.
Argument Based Reasoning; some remarks on the relation between argumentation theory and artificial intelligence.Richard J. Cm Starmans - 1996 - In Johan van Benthem, Logic and argumentation. New York: North-Holland. pp. 209--227.
Informal Logic, Argumentation Theory and Artificial Intelligence.Michael A. Gilbert - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (3).
Algorithms and Arguments: The Foundational Role of the ATAI-question.Paola Cantu' & Italo Testa - 2011 - In Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden & Gordon Mitchell, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Rozenberg / Sic Sat.
Witness Impeachment in Cross-Examination Using Ad Hominem Argumentation.Douglas Walton - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (1):93-114.
Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: The case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks.Weiwei Chen & Ulle Endriss - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 269 (C):27-48.
The Rational Reconstruction of Complex Forms of Legal Argumentation: Approaches from Artificial Intelligence and Law and Pragma-Dialectics. [REVIEW]Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):393-400.
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation.Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 150 (1-2):291-324.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-08-30
Downloads
12 (#1,412,176)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
2024-08-30
Downloads
12 (#1,412,176)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial.Sanjay Modgil & Henry Prakken - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (1):31-62.
On Inferences from Inconsistent Premises.Nicholas Rescher & Ruth Manor - 1970 - Theory and Decision 1 (2):179-217, 1970-1971.
Computing ideal sceptical argumentation.P. M. Dung, P. Mancarella & F. Toni - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):642-674.
A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation.Francesca Toni - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (1):89-117.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-vgkz6 dc2