Evidence against a moving spotlight theory of visual-attention

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (6):509-509 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comparison of moving-spotlight and gradient models of attention.D. Laberge & V. Brown - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):349-349.
Selection by color-mediated by location but not by a moving spotlight.Kr Cave & H. Pashler - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (6):516-516.
Spotlight failure in covert visual orienting.Raymond Klein & Edward Hansen - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (6):447-450.
Visual and tactile scanning: Moving scan versus moving medium.Nicholas C. Noll & Robert J. Weber - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (6):473-476.
Segregation of moving and stationary items in visual-search.Af Kramer, K. Brady, Mp Tham, J. Larish & Yy Yeh - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):472-472.
The role of attention in visual learning.G. Wolford & Hy Kim - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):346-346.
Visual dominance and attention in space.Francis B. Colavita - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 19 (5):261-262.
Distribution of attention in the visual-field.Jf Juola & Dg Bouwhuis - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):326-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references