Abstract

We always thought of universal love Mo total misinterpretation or misunderstanding of some promise, so that the "universal love" and has been in confusing the true meaning. In the twentieth century, we have a re-examine this important concept necessary. Therefore, I grant the application created by Charles Fu敎philosophical methodology - the creation of hermeneutics, that sub-reality, meaning, Yun said that, when called, a record that the five-level, through the layers of analysis to interpret the Universal Love Mo thinking. Which explores the universal love that causes the meaning of universal love Han, "Universal Love is not the parent?", "Get rid of selfishness is in universal love?" And other important issues, and that universal love can not only act as a modern industrial society the ethical principles of personal relationships , but also as the guiding philosophy of business. In the wider field of vision in both review from universal love ideas, and tried to give a fair evaluation. The Moist notion of 'Universal Love' has often been misunderstood by commentators, which makes its real meaning some what misty. In the 20th century today, it is necessary for us to re-examine this important concept. Thus, I appeal to Professor Wei -hsun Fu's' philosophical methodology'-creative hermeneutics, through the following five aspects: reality, meaning, connotation, appropriateness, creativity, to interpret the Moist 'Universal Love'. In this paper, I deal with certain important issues, such as the reason for proposing the notion of 'Universal Love', the meaning of it, "whether 'Universal Love' entails fatherless?", and "whether 'Universal Love' dissolves selfishness?". Meanwhilw I point out that 'Universal Love' can not only be the moral principle in dealing with human relation, but also be the directive principle for business management. I attempt to give a fair evaluation to 'Universal Love' by virtue of re-examining it in a broader range.