- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of: Kaposy C. (2018) Choosing Down Syndrome [Book Review]
Canadian Journal of Bioethics/Revue canadienne de bioéthique 2 (2):21-22 (2019)
Abstract
With the advent of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing, Chris Kaposy believes that more people should choose to parent children with Down Syndrome. Kaposy advocates for the Social Disability Model and recommends a normative pragmatic approach as standard. He makes use of both quantitative and qualitative evidence to support his position.Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Harvey and Gurvir’s Law: Ontario Bill for Quality Prenatal Information about Down Syndrome: Terminology, Feasibility, and Ethical Issues.Marie-Eve Lemoine, Anne-Marie Laberge, Marie-Françoise Malo, Stéphanie Cloutier, Marie-Christine Roy, Stanislav Birko, Andréa Daigle & Vardit Ravitsky - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):651-657.
Prospects for limiting access to prenatal genetic information about Down syndrome in light of the expansion of prenatal genomics.Chris Kaposy - 2022 - The New Bioethics 29 (3):226-246.
Choosing Down Syndrome: Ethics and New Prenatal Testing TechnologiesChrisKaposyMIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2018, 240 pp, Hardcover, US$$27.95 pp. ISBN: 9780262037716. [REVIEW]Rivka Weinberg - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (8):976-977.
People with down syndrome - part of our community.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 18 (2):1.
6. Views on Disability and Prenatal Testing Among Families with Down Syndrome and Disability Activists.Tamar Nov-Klaiman, Marina Frisman, Aviad E. Raz & Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2022 - In Christina Schües (ed.), Genetic Responsibility in Germany and Israel: Practices of Prenatal Diagnosis. Transcript Verlag. pp. 163-190.
A Disability Critique of the New Prenatal Test for Down Syndrome.Chris Kaposy - 2013 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (4):299-324.
Medical Professionals as Agents of Eugenics.Christopher M. Reilly - 2018 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18 (2):237-246.
Why People with Cognitive Disabilities are Justified in Feeling Disquieted by Prenatal Testing and Selective Termination.Chris Kaposy - 2020 - In Adam Cureton & David Wasserman (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability. Oxford University Press. pp. 692-708.
Motherhood in the Context of Normative Discourse: Birth Stories of Mothers of Children with Down Syndrome.Susan L. Gabel & Kathy Kotel - 2018 - Journal of Medical Humanities 39 (2):179-193.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-10
Downloads
14 (#1,275,508)
6 months
7 (#704,497)
2019-05-10
Downloads
14 (#1,275,508)
6 months
7 (#704,497)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2