George Berkeley and Motoori Norinaga on Other Minds and There Being “Nothing to Be Done”

Comparative Philosophy 12 (1) (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The 18th century Irish philosopher George Berkeley argued that we might know of the existence of other minds based upon our experience of having certain sense-data or “ideas” imprinted upon us. This served, for Berkeley, ultimately as a basis for us to know of a “grand” other mind orchestrating the order among said ideas imprinted upon us, that is, God. This leap to God, however, has been challenged over the past three decades. A very rudimentary form could still be retained though from Berkeley’s argument for God, whereby Berkeley argued that human minds were dependent upon other “more powerful” minds. I shall open with the contention that Berkeley did not actually show that there must exist one or many other minds orchestrating the order among imprinted ideas. This contention shall serve as the ground for speculating what form Berkeleyanism would take, if we posit many other minds instead of one God. I shall argue that this Berkeleyanism “reworked” on the premise of many other minds, could understand those ideas imprinted upon us as having been decided by a commune of finite other minds. I shall also argue that the experience of having ideas imprinted upon us is identical to an experience the Japanese thinker of the same century, Motoori Norinaga, expressed with the phrase semusubenaki. This experience of there being “nothing-to-be-done” shall also be situated within the Berkeleyanism “reworked” around the premise of a commune of other minds imprinting ideas upon us to speculative ends.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,566

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Solipcism in George Berkeley's Philosophy.Vinícius França Freitas - 2021 - Analytica. Revista de Filosofia 23 (2):88-116.
New interpretations of Berkeley's thought.Stephen Hartley Daniel (ed.) - 2008 - Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.
Berkeley's Argument for Other Minds.Lorne Falkenstein - 1990 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (4):431 - 440.
The Intentionality of Intentions.Annette C. Baier - 1977 - Review of Metaphysics 30 (3):389 - 414.
Berkeley on God's Knowledge of Pain.Stephen H. Daniel - 2018 - In Stefan Storrie, Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 136-145.
An Alleged Incoherence in Berkeley's Philosophy.Reinaldo Elugardo - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (sup1):177-189.
Perception, Evidence, and our Expressive Knowledge of Others' Minds.Anil Gomes - 2019 - In Anita Avramides & Matthew Parrott, Knowing Other Minds. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Berkeley.Daniel E. Flage - 2014 - Malden, MA: Polity.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-31

Downloads
33 (#739,955)

6 months
5 (#801,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Idealism Without God.Helen Yetter-Chappell - 2017 - In K. Pearce & T. Goldschmidt, Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Berkeley.Daniel E. Flage - 2014 - Malden, MA: Polity.

Add more references