Realism or Locality: Which Should We Abandon? [Book Review]

Foundations of Physics 29 (4):553-560 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We reconsider the consequences of the observed violations of Bell's inequalities. Two common responses to these violations are (i) the rejection of realism and the retention of locality and (ii) the rejection of locality and the retention of realism. Here we critique response (i). We argue that locality contains an implicit form of realism, since in a worldview that embraces locality, spacetime, with its usual, fixed topology, has properties independent of measurement. Hence we argue that response (i) is incomplete, in that its rejection of realism is only partial

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
103 (#205,178)

6 months
8 (#575,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Against 'Realism'.Travis Norsen - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):311-340.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philoophical Consequences of Quantum Theory.James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.) - 1989 - University of Notre Dame Press.

Add more references