Is Collingwood a Historicist? Remarks on Leo Strauss’s Critique of Collingwood’s Philosophy of History

Journal of the Philosophy of History 11 (3):324-341 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Réponses à mes critiques.Sophie Marcotte Chénard - 2023 - Philosophiques 50 (1):151-174.
The 'object' of historical knowledge.Patrick Gardiner - 1952 - Philosophy 27 (102):211-220.
The vicissitude of completeness: Gadamer's criticism of Collingwood.Dimitrios Vardoulakis - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):3 – 19.
Collingwood and the Philosophy of History: The Metaphilosophical Dimension.Jonas Ahlskog - 2018 - In Karim Dharamsi, Giuseppina D'Oro & Stephen Leach (eds.), Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 209-227.
On Collingwood's Philosophy of History.Leo Strauss - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (4):559-586.
Collingwood's theory of history.Errol E. Harris - 1957 - Philosophical Quarterly 7 (26):35-49.
Leo Strauss on Collingwood.Alessandra Fussi - 2014 - Idealistic Studies 44 (2-3):149-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-12

Downloads
23 (#915,501)

6 months
7 (#655,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Philosophy and History.Leo Strauss - 1949 - Journal of the History of Ideas 10 (1):30.
Historicism: an attempt at synthesis.Frank R. Ankersmit - 1995 - History and Theory 34 (3):143-161.
IX.—The Nature and Aims of a Philosophy of History.R. G. Collingwood - 1925 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 25 (1):151-174.

Add more references