Epistemic Contextualism, Epistemic Relativism, and Disagreement: Reply to Robin McKenna

Philosophical Writings:100-103 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are two issues I want to very briefly raise in response to Robin McKenna’s paper, “Epistemic Contextualism, Epistemic Relativism, and Disagreement.” First, I want to question whether or not the disagreement problem faced by indexical contextualism is truly a problem. Secondly, I want to consider whether or not McKenna’s solution is really in keeping with indexical contextualism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relativism and Contextualism.Patrick Rysiew - 2010 - In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 286–305.
On the contrary: disagreement, context, and relative truth.Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes - 2011 - Dissertation, University of St Andrews and University of Oslo
Epistemic contextualism defended.Robin McKenna - 2015 - Synthese 192 (2):363-383.
From Epistemic Contextualism to Epistemic Expressivism.Matthew Chrisman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (2):225-254.
The Many Relativisms: Index, Context, and Beyond.Dan López de Sa - 2010 - In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 102–117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-19

Downloads
293 (#93,085)

6 months
69 (#87,264)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian M. Church
Hillsdale College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references