De re'/ 'de dicto' distinctions

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 22 (35) (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

De re i de dicto.Andrzej Cieśluk - 2009 - Diametros 22:134-150.
Free Quantified Epistemic Logics.Giovanna Corsi & Eugenio Orlandelli - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (6):1159-1183.
De re and de dicto.Thomas Jager - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):81-90.
ModelTtheory for Modal Logic. Part I — The de re/de Dicto distinction.Kit Fine - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):125 - 156.
Names and the 'de re — de dicto' distinction.G. W. Fitch - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 39 (1):25 - 34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-10

Downloads
4 (#1,807,862)

6 months
4 (#1,272,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Louise M. Antony - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):275.
The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans & John Mcdowell - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (238):534-538.
Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference.Saul A. Kripke - 1977 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2 (1):255-276.
Speaker's reference and semantic reference.Saul A. Kripke - 1977 - In Peter A. French, Theodore Edward Uehling & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Studies in the philosophy of language. Morris: University of Minnesota, Morris. pp. 255-296.
Quantifying in.David Kaplan - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):178-214.

View all 13 references / Add more references