Comparing First Order Theories of Modules over Group Rings

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (1):147-156 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider R-torsionfree modules over group rings RG, where R is a Dedekind domain and G is a finite group. In the first part of the paper [4] we compared the theory T of all R-torsionfree RG-modules and the theory T0 of RG-lattices , and we realized that they are almost always different. Now we compare their behaviour with respect to decidability, when RG-lattices are of finite, or wild representation type

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,962

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
27 (#912,623)

6 months
5 (#864,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The decision problem for {vec Z}C(p^3)-lattices with p prime.Carlo Toffalori - 1998 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (2):127-142.
An undecidability theorem for lattices over group rings.Carlo Toffalori - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (2-3):241-262.

Add more references