Defining the Scope of Casey and Salzman's Application of the Rule of Double Effect to the Therapeutic and Prophylactic Uses of Combined Oral Contraceptives

American Journal of Bioethics 14 (7):35-38 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religion, Clinical Misconceptions, and Access to Contraception.Jonathan F. Will - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (7):40-41.
“Reinventing” the rule of double effect.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 114--49.
Distinguishing the Doctrine of Double Effect from its Application.Albert Duggan - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):28-30.
Contraception and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (7):42-43.
Humanae vitae, Rape and the Zika Virus.Gary Michael Atkinson - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (2):209-214.
Is 'best proven' a useless criterion?Florencia Luna - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (4):273–288.
The Prophylactic Effects of Intentional Contraception.Jayne Lucke - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (7):38-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-01

Downloads
32 (#694,839)

6 months
9 (#451,423)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
The Role and Responsibility of the Moral Philosopher.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1982 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 56:12-25.
“Reinventing” the rule of double effect.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 114--49.

View all 13 references / Add more references