Hans Jonas' Feeble Theodicy: How on Earth Could God Retire?

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):305 - 322 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we criticize Hans Jonas’s analogy between God’s power and the operation of physical forces. We wonder why, if omnipotence had proved to be "a self-contradictory concept", does Jonas still need to invoke the occurrence of horrendous evils to support the view that "God is not all powerful". We suggest that "God’s retreating into himself in order to give room to the world, renouncing his being and divesting himself of his deity" are beautiful but inconsistent metaphors of creation. Our central claim is that God’s alleged retirement, even if it were conceivable, would not the least diminish his responsibility in the occurrence of evil

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-02

Downloads
2,547 (#4,351)

6 months
160 (#25,445)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.William L. Rowe - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4):335 - 341.
19 The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.William Rowe - 1999 - In Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 6--157.
Creation.James F. Ross - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (10):614-629.
Causality and creation.Peter Geach - 1962 - Sophia 1 (3):27-30.
Causality and creation.Peter Geach - 1962 - Sophia 1 (1):1-8.

Add more references