Learning incommensurate concepts

Synthese 205 (3):1-36 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A central task of developmental psychology and philosophy of science is to show how humans learn radically new concepts. Famously, Fodor has argued that such learning is impossible if concepts have definitional structure and all learning is hypothesis testing. We present several learning processes that can generate novel concepts. They yield transformations of the fundamental feature space, generating new similarity structures which can underlie conceptual change. This framework provides a tractable, empiricist-friendly account that unifies and shores up various strands of the neo-Quinean approach to conceptual development.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-12

Downloads
197 (#129,171)

6 months
197 (#17,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Hayley Clatterbuck
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Hunter Gentry
Kansas State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.Jerry Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Philosophy 31 (118):268-269.

View all 43 references / Add more references