The rules of division

The Philosophers' Magazine 13 (13):42-43 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider, and rebut, the argument from "twinning" - that zygotes can't be considered human individuals as two or more such individuals could be (sometimes are) produced from one zygote.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The rules of division.Stephen Clark - 2001 - The Philosophers' Magazine (13):42-43.
Aristotle’s Rules of Division in the Topics.Andrea Falcon - 1996 - Ancient Philosophy 16 (2):377-387.
One substance, many voters. [REVIEW]Mark Hannam - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 50 (Q3):125-126.
Popular philosophy.Rodger L. Jackson - 2016 - The Philosophers' Magazine 72:61-62.
Why it can’t be Professor Plum.Duncan Pritchard - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 33:82-84.
Can’t Everyone Just Comb Down?Jean Kazez - 2016 - The Philosophers' Magazine 73:100-102.
Why you can’t make a valid point.Peter S. Fosl - 2007 - The Philosophers' Magazine 37:79-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
141 (#159,561)

6 months
12 (#312,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen R. L. Clark
University of Liverpool

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references