Two Notes on the Latin Subjunctive

The Classical Review 14 (04):222- (1900)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0009840x00082494

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Latin Subjunctive. [REVIEW]E. C. Woodcock - 1948 - The Classical Review 62 (2):73-79.
The Latin Aorist Subjunctive.A. K. F. - 1890 - The Classical Review 4 (08):342-346.
The Latin Aorist Subjunctive.E. A. Sonnenschein - 1890 - The Classical Review 4 (09):398-399.
A Negleoted use of the Latin Subjunctive.H. C. Elmer - 1898 - The Classical Review 12 (04):199-205.
The Unity of the Latin Subjunctive: A Quest.R. S. Conway - 1910 - The Classical Review 24 (7):215-216.
The 'Prospective Subjunctive' in Greek and Latin.Wm Gardner Hale - 1894 - The Classical Review 8 (04):166-169.
Should the May-Potential Use of the Subjunctive be Recognized in Latin ?H. C. Elmer - 1900 - The Classical Review 14 (04):219-222.
On the Prospective Use of the Latin Imperfect Subjunctive in Relative Clauses.W. J. Goodrich - 1917 - The Classical Review 31 (3-4):83-86.
The Latin Subjunctive of Determined Futurity.F. H. Fowler - 1917 - Classical Weekly 11:161-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-06

Downloads
67 (#327,291)

6 months
15 (#168,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references