Replies to Hatzimoysis, Hufendiek and Sievers, Majeed, Gerrans, and Whiting

Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 5 (2):52-61 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concerns of each commentary are addressed in turn. I clarify and defend the claims of The Emotional Mind with regards to the plausibility of automatic responses to representational content, the distinction between emotions and bodily feelings, the influence of social contexts upon emotional responses, the complex issue of whether emotions are modular or form natural kinds, the nature of pain asymbolia, and the nature of emotional authenticity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-03

Downloads
50 (#457,975)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Cochrane
Flinders University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Consciousness, Attention, and the Motivation-Affect System.Tom Cochrane - 2023 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 30 (7):139-163.
What Pain Asymbolia Really Shows.Colin Klein - 2015 - Mind 124 (494):493-516.
Valent Representation: Problems and Prospects.Anthony Hatzimoysis - 2024 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 5 (2):17-23.
Does the Problem of Variability Justify Barrett’s Emotion Revolution?Raamy Majeed - 2023 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (4):1421-1441.

View all 10 references / Add more references