The Three-Fold Significance of the Blaming Emotions

In David Shoemaker, Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 205-224 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the idea that someone can deserve resentment or other reactive emotions for what she does by attention to three psychological functions of such emotions—appraisal, communication, and sanction—that I argue ground claims of their desert. I argue that attention to these functions helps to elucidate the moral aims of reactive emotions and to distinguish the distinct claims of desert, as opposed to other moral considerations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-20

Downloads
858 (#28,629)

6 months
139 (#36,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Zac Cogley
Ohio State University (PhD)

Citations of this work

The emotion account of blame.Leonhard Menges - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (1):257-273.
Contempt's Evaluative Presentation and Connection to Accountability.Zac Cogley - 2018 - In Michelle Mason, The Moral Psychology of Contempt. Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 131-150.
A Defense of Angry Blame.Lyn Alison Radke - 2019 - Dissertation, Vanderbilt University

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mark Ravizza.
Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references