No Sour Grapes for Nietzsche

International Studies in Philosophy 25 (2):145-149 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Refutes the suggestion that Nietzsche's atheism is the result of sour grapes, i.e. his own failure to form a relationship with the divine, and argues that Nietzsche's rejection of sour grapes is, to the contrary, one of the best possible encapsulations of his philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sour grapes and character planning.Luc Bovens - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):57-78.
Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sour grapes, rational desires and objective consequentialism.M. Rickard - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 80 (3):279 - 303.
Heroin and Sour Grapes: The Sins of Their Fathers.[author unknown] - 1980 - Ethics and Medics 5 (2):4-4.
Sour grapes–utilitarianism and the genesis of wants. Sen A, Williams B.J. Elster - 1982 - In Amartya Sen & Bernard Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 219--238.
In defense of adaptive preferences.Donald W. Bruckner - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):307 - 324.
J. ELSTER: "Sour Grapes. Studies in the Subversion of Rationality". [REVIEW]G. Boss - 1985 - Revue de ThĂ©ologie Et de Philosophie 117:255.
Sour grapes: studies in the subversion of rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
38 (#596,865)

6 months
12 (#305,729)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan R Cohen
Bates College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references