Smoke and Mirrors: An Analysis of Some Important Conceptions Used to Justify Hunting

In Andrew Linzey & Clair Linzey (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Practical Animal Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan Uk. pp. 333-347 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purported justifications for recreational hunting, and specifically deer hunting, are analyzed, and are found to be morally incoherent and/or scientifically invalid.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Hunting Moral?Joshua Duclos - 2017 - The Conversation.
A Moral Defense of Trophy Hunting.Timothy Hsiao - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (1):26-34.
Hunting.Michael MacKinnon - 2014 - In Gordon Lindsay Campbell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life. Oxford University Press.
Hunting as a Moral Good.Lawrence Cahoone - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (1):67 - 89.
The Camera or the Gun.Jonathan Parker - 2010 - In Fritz Allhoff & Nathan Kowalsky (eds.), Hunting Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 161–170.
Dignitarian Hunting.Dan Demetriou & Bob Fischer - 2018 - Social Theory and Practice 44 (1):49-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
8 (#1,582,060)

6 months
6 (#866,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

From the Editors: Unquestioned Assumptions.Andrew Linzey & Clair Linzey - 2020 - Journal of Animal Ethics 10 (1):v-vi.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references