Searle's theory of speech acts

Philosophical Review 79 (4):545-557 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2184294

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Assertion and Evaluation in Searle’s Theory of Speech Acts.A. C. Genova - 1971 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 2 (1-2):65-72.
“On Indirect Speech Acts and Linguistic Communication: A Response to Bertolet”1: McGowan, Tam and Hall.Mary Kate McGowan, Shan Shan Tam & Margaret Hall - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (4):495-513.
Meaning and speech acts.R. M. Hare - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (1):3-24.
Hare on meaning and speech acts.G. J. Warnock - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (1):80-84.
Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.Warren Ingber, Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (1):134.
Intention and convention in speech acts.Peter F. Strawson - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (4):439-460.
Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. [REVIEW]Brian Loar - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (3):488-493.
Following Searle on Twitter: How Words Create Digital Institutions.Adam Hodgkin - 2017 - University of Chicago Press.
Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts: A Main Theme in F. L. Austin's Philosophy.John R. Searle & Mats Furberg - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):389.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#338,701)

6 months
13 (#242,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Insulting.Justin Leiber - 1979 - Philosophia 8 (4):549-571.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references