Acknowledgment, Responsibility, and Innovation: A Response to Robert Innis and Walter Gulick

Tradition and Discovery 36 (1):38-41 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This response affirms the content of the previous two articles but is focused on highlighting some features of Polanyi’s and Langer’s philosophies they do not emphasize. The rise of knowledge and trajectory of meaning Polanyi and Langer describe may be seen as incorporating a complex, innovative process of acknowledgment – of tradition, social norms, previous experience, and personal commitments of which one may not even be aware – for which one is responsible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Michael Polanyi and Charles Sanders Peirce.Phil Mullins - 2011 - Tradition and Discovery 38 (3):7-12.
Michael Polanyi and Charles Sanders Peirce.Phil Mullins - 2011 - Tradition and Discovery 38 (3):7-12.
Michael Polanyi.Paul Craig Roberts - 2005 - Tradition and Discovery 32 (3):15-18.
Michael Polanyi: A Man For All Times.Paul Craig Roberts - 2005 - Tradition and Discovery 32 (3):15-18.
The Man Who Fell Among Theologians.Marty Moleski - 2005 - Tradition and Discovery 32 (3):35-39.
Wittgenstein and Polanyi: Metaphysics Reconsidered.Charles W. Lowney - 1999 - Tradition and Discovery 26 (1):19-27.
How “Catholic” Is Personal Catholicism?John V. Apczynski - 2001 - Tradition and Discovery 28 (1):28-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
110 (#194,363)

6 months
1 (#1,887,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vincent Colapietro
Pennsylvania State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references