Bonum ex machina (MA Thesis)

Dissertation, University of Calgary (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this MA thesis, I consider the question “Can a machine be an agent?” and argue that the answer to this question is no. The main basis for this answer is in the relationship that machines have – or rather, lack – to the goods that make up reasons for action. The main argument for this appears in the first two chapters. There, I explain the links between agents, reasons, and goods. Chapters three and four elaborate upon what counts as having reasons for action by way of addressing objections to my claim that machines do not act for reasons. The fifth and final chapter considers the difficulty of agency as a design problem, and emphasizes my argument’s basis in the relationship between humans and machines.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rational Action: Reasons, Causes, and Choices.David Redmond - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Missouri, St. Louis
Actual Control - Demodalising Free Will.David Heering - 2020 - Dissertation, University of Leeds
Agent Causality.F. Vollmer - 1999 - Springer Verlag.
A noncausal theory of agency.Stewart Goetz - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (2):303-316.
Why Should I Be Moral?D. A. Lloyd Thomas - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):128 - 139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
10 (#1,481,570)

6 months
6 (#901,624)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Evangelian Collings
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references