- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Explainable AI tools for legal reasoning about cases: A study on the European Court of Human Rights
Artificial Intelligence 317 (C):103861 (2023)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument (TREVOR JM BENCH-CAPON).G. C. Christie - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):59-71.
An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application.Alison Chorley & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (3-4):323-371.
Distinguishing two features of accountability for AI technologies.Zoe Porter, Annette Zimmermann, Phillip Morgan, John McDermid, Tom Lawton & Ibrahim Habli - 2022 - Nature Machine Intelligence 4:734–736.
Human rights, citizen rights: The presuppositions of the american and european case law.Gregory Lewkowicz - unknown
Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights.Masha Medvedeva, Michel Vols & Martijn Wieling - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (2):237-266.
Exploring explainable AI in the tax domain.Łukasz Górski, Błażej Kuźniacki, Marco Almada, Kamil Tyliński, Madalena Calvo, Pablo Matias Asnaghi, Luciano Almada, Hilario Iñiguez, Fernando Rubianes, Octavio Pera & Juan Ignacio Nigrelli - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-29.
Artificial intelligence as law. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (2):181-206.
An improved factor based approach to precedential constraint.Adam Rigoni - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (2):133-160.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-02-01
Downloads
30 (#747,543)
6 months
8 (#574,086)
2023-02-01
Downloads
30 (#747,543)
6 months
8 (#574,086)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Toward representing interpretation in factor-based models of precedent.Adam Rigoni - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law.
Intermediate factors and precedential constraint.Trevor Bench-Capon - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-20.
Annotated insights into legal reasoning: A dataset of Article 6 ECHR cases.Jack Mumford, Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2024 - Argument and Computation 15 (2):113-119.
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.Henry Prakken - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):93-124.
A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values.Trevor Bench-Capon & Giovanni Sartor - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 150 (1-2):97-143.
A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks.Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (1):1-49.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-9l5tj dc2