- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Introduction
In L. Comstock Gary (ed.), Vexing Nature?: On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology. Boston: Kluwer. pp. 1-11 (2000)
Abstract
Agricultural biotechnology refers to a diverse set of industrial techniques used to produce genetically modified foods. Genetically modified foods are foods manipulated at the molecular level to enhance their value to farmers and consumers. This book is a collection of essays on the ethical dimensions of ag biotech. The essays were written over a dozen years, beginning in 1988.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Vexing Nature?: On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology.L. Comstock Gary - 2000 - Boston: Kluwer.
What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos.Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.) - 2008 - Elsevier/Academic Press.
The transatlantic rift in genetically modified food policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Against the neoliberal steamroller? The Biosafety Protocol and the social regulation of agricultural biotechnologies.Daniel Lee Kleinman & Abby J. Kinchy - 2007 - Agriculture and Human Values 24 (2):195-206.
GMOs and global justice: Applying global justice theory to the case of genetically modified crops and foods.K. Høyer Toft - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):223-237.
Does autonomy count in favor of labeling genetically modified food?Kirsten Hansen - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
A Framework for the Ethical Analysis of Novel Foods: The Ethical Matrix.Mepham Ben - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):165-176.
Review of Gary L. Comstock, Vexing Nature: On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology. [REVIEW]Kristin Schrader-Frechette - 2003 - Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (1):127-129.
Review of Gary L. Comstock, Vexing Nature: On the Ethical Case against Agricultural Biotechnology. [REVIEW]Kristin Schrader-Frechette - 2003 - Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (1):127-129.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-01-25
Downloads
10 (#1,469,173)
6 months
3 (#1,470,822)
2022-01-25
Downloads
10 (#1,469,173)
6 months
3 (#1,470,822)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Losing ground: Farmland preservation, economic utilitarianism, and the erosion of the agrarian ideal.Matthew J. Mariola - 2005 - Agriculture and Human Values 22 (2):209-223.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2