Mr. J. Kemp and Æsthetic Judgments

&
Philosophy 34 (128):47 - 49 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I agree with most of Mr. Kemp's paper, “Generalization in the Philosophy of Art” but on his position at one point I should like briefly to comment.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031819100029739

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,665

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mr. J. Kemp and æSthetic Judgments: PHILOSOPHY.Constance I. Smith - 1959 - Philosophy 34 (128):47-49.
Sense data, linguistic conventions, and existence.Gustav Bergmann - 1947 - Philosophy of Science 14 (2):152-163.
New Studies in the Philosophy of Descartes by Norman Kemp Smith; Descartes' Philosophical Writings by Norman Kemp Smith; The Method of Descartes. A Study of the Regulae by L. J. Beck. [REVIEW]Thomas Kuhn - 1955 - Isis 46:377-380.
The Credibility of Divine Existence. [REVIEW]A. R. E. - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 21 (3):561-562.
Saving the Strong Programme: a critique of Stephen Kemp’s recent paper.Márta Fehér - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):235-240.
Professor Pike on Part III of Hume's Dialogues: PHEROZE S. WADIA.Pheroze S. Wadia - 1978 - Religious Studies 14 (3):325-342.
Norman Kemp Smith on the experience of duration.Geoffrey Gorham - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (2):295-313.
Verbatim Report of the Three Trials for Blasphemy of Mssrs. G.W. Foote, W.J. Ramsey, and H.A. Kemp Before Mr. Justice North and Common Juries on the 1st and 5th March 1883 at the Old Bailey and of Mssrs. Foote and Ramsey, Before the Lord Chief Justice of England, and a Special Jury, in the Queen's Bench, on April 24, 1883.G. W. Foote, W. J. Ramsey & H. A. Kemp - 1883 - Progressive Publishing Co.
“Ought” from “Is” 1 I am grateful for criticisms of an earlier version from Mr. R. M. Hare (who kindly showed me a paper of his own on the earlier part of Searle's specimen argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams. [REVIEW]Roger Montague - 1965 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):144-167.
Minds, machines and Godel: A reply to mr Lucas.C. Whitely - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (January):61-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
58 (#363,338)

6 months
17 (#165,598)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references