Review: Criterial Problems [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 143 (3):417 - 426 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The two main topics of the paper are an allegedly justified reliability requirement for knowledge and an alleged incoherence among three propositions asserted by Cartesian foundationalism. It is argued that neither the allegation of justified reliability nor the allegation of incoherence is correct.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Alston on Iterative Foundationalism and Cartesian Epistemology.Stephen Jacobson - 1992 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):133 - 144.
Reliability and Justified Belief.John L. Pollock - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):103 - 114.
Externalist justification without reliability.Michael Bergmann - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):35–60.
Goldman's reliability theory of justified belief.Elizabeth Ring - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (4):501 – 507.
The reliability problem for reliabilism.Matthew Frise - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (4):923-945.
Foundational Justification.Richard Feldman - 2004 - In John Greco (ed.), Ernest Sosa: And His Critics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 42–58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-02

Downloads
164 (#143,149)

6 months
16 (#195,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Earl Conee
University of Rochester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references