Art, nature, significance

The Philosophers' Magazine 44 (44):27-35 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is by now something of a cliché of Green discourse that environmental degradation and devastation is grounded in a sharp opposition – the legacy, it is often charged, of Christian metaphysics – between the human and the non-human, between the realms of culture and nature. If one is to understand, let alone endorse, the very general environmentalist ambition to dissolve the dualism of the human and the non-human, it is by questioning rather more tractable and particular dichotomies, like that between art and nature appreciation, where it would seem wise to begin.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is nature?: Culture, politics, and the non-human.Wayne Ouderkirk - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (1):105-108.
Are People Part of Nature? Yes and No.Anna Deplazes-Zemp - 2022 - Environmental Ethics 44 (2):99-119.
Descartes, Hume and Human Nature.Francis Moorcroft - 1997 - The Philosophers' Magazine 1:14-16.
Taoism and the nature of nature.Roger T. Ames - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (4):317-350.
Myth, nature, and the bureaucratic experience.Michael V. Mcginnis - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (4):425-436.
A Philosophy of Gardens.David E. Cooper - 2006 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
82 (#253,821)

6 months
10 (#388,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Cooper
Durham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references