Faster-than-light particles: A reply to Franklin [Book Review]

Foundations of Physics 12 (12):1183-1193 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Franklin's underrating the importance of the time-of-flight measurements contradicts Segrè's account of the experiment in two journals and Chamberlain's Nobel Prize acceptance speech. Franklin further fails to understand that Segrè's velocity selector method of determining antiproton and proton mass also depends upon measuring the S1-to-S2 flight distance. Franklin's conclusion that there is no evidence that the Segrè mesons are traveling faster than light is based on a faulty premise about the average antiproton velocity

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
24 (#911,194)

6 months
7 (#711,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thirty years that shook physics.George Gamow - 1972 - London,: Heinemann Educational.
Have faster-than-light particles already been detected?J. C. Cooper - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (5-6):461-466.
Cooper's evidence for faster-than-light particles.Allan Franklin - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (12):1181-1182.

Add more references