Some comments on the sense-datum theory and the argument from illusion

Dialogue (Misc) 28:8-15 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sense-data and the argument from illusion.Donnie J. Self - 1974 - Dialogue (Misc) 16:53-56.
The Argument from Illusion and the Uniqueness Assumption (2nd edition).Gu Zhiwei - 2020 - Journal of Human Cognition 4 (2):41-52.
The Argument From the Hand.Peter T. Cash - 1979 - Philosophical Investigations 2 (4):47-70.
A Theory of Sense-Data.Andrew Y. Lee - forthcoming - Analytic Philosophy.
Has Austin refuted the sense-datum theory?A. J. Ayer - 1967 - Synthese 17 (1):117-140.
Perceptual Phenomenology and Direct Realism.Caleb Liang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:103-148.
Illusions and sense-data.David H. Sanford - 1981 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):371-385.
Sense And Sensibilia; Reconstructed From The Manuscript Notes By G J Warnock.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford University Press.
Basic properties and sense datum attributes.Andr Gallois - 1979 - Personalist 60 (January):53-60.
Assessing Robinson’s “Revised Causal Argument” for Sense-Data.David Davies - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):209-224.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1 (#1,945,614)

6 months
1 (#1,889,092)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references